A104 Amend Canon IV.6.9
One of the persistent concerns the Court of Review has heard from the church since its inception, is the length of time it takes Title IV matters to progress from Intake to final resolution. In many cases, the longer a matter is pending, the greater the harm experienced by potentially injured parties, affected communities, complainants, and dioceses. Further, it has been the repeated experience of Hearing Panels conducted in The Episcopal Church that process delay has become an intentional procedural tactic employed by various participants. While the canons provide specific opportunities to limit delay at some later stages of the process, even those tools are often ineffective in the face of extensive discovery and motion arguments, continuance requests, scheduling conflicts, and other sources of delay. This amendment would attempt to reduce overall process length by prioritizing the needs of injured parties, affected communities, complainants, and Dioceses, by setting an overall time limit of 15 months from the date of the initial written Intake Report within which Title IV matters must reach final adjudication, absent extraordinary circumstances (such as, for example, pending criminal trials). It would also empower the President of the Disciplinary Board, after consultation with the relevant panel, to adjust any time periods prescribed by Title IV at various stages of panel consideration to accomplish this objective. This approach helps our disciplinary process better balance the overall objectives of Title IV and the needs of all the various parties.
Explanation
One of the persistent concerns the Court of Review has heard from the church since its inception, is the length of time it takes Title IV matters to progress from Intake to final resolution. In many cases, the longer a matter is pending, the greater the harm experienced by potentially injured parties, affected communities, complainants, and dioceses. Further, it has been the repeated experience of Hearing Panels conducted in The Episcopal Church that process delay has become an intentional procedural tactic employed by various participants. While the canons provide specific opportunities to limit delay at some later stages of the process, even those tools are often ineffective in the face of extensive discovery and motion arguments, continuance requests, scheduling conflicts, and other sources of delay. This amendment would attempt to reduce overall process length by prioritizing the needs of injured parties, affected communities, complainants, and Dioceses, by setting an overall time limit of 15 months from the date of the initial written Intake Report within which Title IV matters must reach final adjudication, absent extraordinary circumstances (such as, for example, pending criminal trials). It would also empower the President of the Disciplinary Board, after consultation with the relevant panel, to adjust any time periods prescribed by Title IV at various stages of panel consideration to accomplish this objective. This approach helps our disciplinary process better balance the overall objectives of Title IV and the needs of all the various parties.